Britannia Tiger Krunch Chocochip vs RiteBite Max Protein Active Choco Slim
Both products are scored on the same eleven per-100g factors, so every figure below is directly comparable. Neither is recommended over the other - the numbers are shown so you can weigh the ones that matter to you.
The chocolate chip cookie in Britannia's Tiger range, aimed at children and priced below the Good Day line. Its declaration puts choco chips at 8% and cocoa solids at 1.6%, with the chips built on hydrogenated vegetable fat rather than cocoa butter, and it is fortified with a ferrous salt. It also carries colours 150c, 124 and 133. It is sold in 36 g wrappers and a 400 g carton. Britannia publishes the declaration and the pack's nutrition panel image; that image has now been read and the nine values below are the pack's own.
A 20 g protein bar in RiteBite's Active line, positioned for weight management rather than mass gain and sold as a single 70 g bar. It shares the Active line's price point with the Choco Fudge and Green Coffee Beans bars. Its barcode is published on the brand's own storefront; no ingredient declaration could be retrieved from Open Food Facts or from any reachable page, but a retailer-published panel for this exact flavour has supplied the nine values below - they are not inferred from a sibling flavour.
Each factor is scored 0-100 against the published thresholds, then weighted into the overall score. The highlighted side is the higher factor score, not a recommendation.
Metric
Britannia Tiger Krunch Chocochip
RiteBite Max Protein Active Choco Slim
Ingredients
80 /100
100 /100
Saturated Fat
40 /100
50 /100
Protein
30 /100
100 /100
Calories
30 /100
80 /100
Added Sugar
20 /100
100 /100
Sodium
60 /100
60 /100
Total Fat
40 /100
50 /100
Carbohydrates
30 /100
60 /100
Total Sugar
20 /100
90 /100
Fibre
10 /100
90 /100
Processing
10 /100
100 /100
Nutrition, per 100g
Per 100g, which is the basis both packs declare and the only one on which two products can be compared directly - why that matters.
