Britannia Vita Marie Gold vs RiteBite Max Protein Active Choco Slim
Both products are scored on the same eleven per-100g factors, so every figure below is directly comparable. Neither is recommended over the other - the numbers are shown so you can weigh the ones that matter to you.
The fortified variant of Britannia's marie biscuit, declared as 66% refined wheat flour against 74% in the standard Marie Gold, with a correspondingly larger share of milk products and an added vitamin and mineral premix. The declaration is otherwise close to the standard recipe. Britannia publishes the full ingredient list and a nutrition panel image for this SKU; that image has now been read, so its nine values are the fortified pack's own rather than copied from the standard Marie Gold.
A 20 g protein bar in RiteBite's Active line, positioned for weight management rather than mass gain and sold as a single 70 g bar. It shares the Active line's price point with the Choco Fudge and Green Coffee Beans bars. Its barcode is published on the brand's own storefront; no ingredient declaration could be retrieved from Open Food Facts or from any reachable page, but a retailer-published panel for this exact flavour has supplied the nine values below - they are not inferred from a sibling flavour.
Each factor is scored 0-100 against the published thresholds, then weighted into the overall score. The highlighted side is the higher factor score, not a recommendation.
Metric
Britannia Vita Marie Gold
RiteBite Max Protein Active Choco Slim
Ingredients
90 /100
100 /100
Protein
50 /100
100 /100
Calories
50 /100
80 /100
Saturated Fat
50 /100
50 /100
Added Sugar
30 /100
100 /100
Total Fat
60 /100
50 /100
Processing
50 /100
100 /100
Total Sugar
30 /100
90 /100
Sodium
40 /100
60 /100
Fibre
10 /100
90 /100
Carbohydrates
20 /100
60 /100
Nutrition, per 100g
Per 100g, which is the basis both packs declare and the only one on which two products can be compared directly - why that matters.
