RiteBite Max Protein Active Choco Slim vs Yogabar Protein Minis 4g Choco Peanut Butter
Both products are scored on the same eleven per-100g factors, so every figure below is directly comparable. Neither is recommended over the other - the numbers are shown so you can weigh the ones that matter to you.
A 20 g protein bar in RiteBite's Active line, positioned for weight management rather than mass gain and sold as a single 70 g bar. It shares the Active line's price point with the Choco Fudge and Green Coffee Beans bars. Its barcode is published on the brand's own storefront; no ingredient declaration could be retrieved from Open Food Facts or from any reachable page, but a retailer-published panel for this exact flavour has supplied the nine values below - they are not inferred from a sibling flavour.
A 20 g mini bar delivering 4 g of protein, sold as a 24 piece box of 480 g and positioned as a portion-controlled dark chocolate snack rather than a full protein bar. Yogabar markets it on the absence of trans fat. It is the cheapest entry point in the brand's bar range by unit. Yogabar publishes a nutrition panel image on the product page; that image has now been read into the nine values below. Open Food Facts holds a record for the barcode with no nutriments and no declaration against it.
Each factor is scored 0-100 against the published thresholds, then weighted into the overall score. The highlighted side is the higher factor score, not a recommendation.
Metric
RiteBite Max Protein Active Choco Slim
Yogabar Protein Minis 4g Choco Peanut Butter
Added Sugar
100 /100
40 /100
Protein
100 /100
90 /100
Fibre
90 /100
100 /100
Ingredients
100 /100
100 /100
Calories
80 /100
60 /100
Total Sugar
90 /100
20 /100
Processing
100 /100
100 /100
Saturated Fat
50 /100
30 /100
Sodium
60 /100
60 /100
Carbohydrates
60 /100
50 /100
Total Fat
50 /100
50 /100
Nutrition, per 100g
Per 100g, which is the basis both packs declare and the only one on which two products can be compared directly - why that matters.
